🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.