🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors told the court that police maintained reasonable suspicions that Tommy Robinson's phone held information related to terrorist activities when they detained him in the previous year as he tried to leave the UK.

Denial to Provide Phone Pin

The right-wing campaigner, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, allegedly refused to hand over his phone pin to police, stating it contained journalist content.” This occurred after he was stopped at the Eurotunnel on 28 July 2024.

Trial Arguments on Anti-Terror Authority

On the last day of the trial, prosecutor the prosecution argued that the anti-terror authorities employed by law enforcement are intended to permit information collection. She claimed that officers had valid grounds to believe Robinson still have connections to far-right activists, even after the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

“Although his affiliation of the English Defence League has come to an end, his beliefs have not gone away. He is known for having those views and therefore it is a valid concern to think that on his phone there could be information pertaining to terrorist acts,” she told the court.

Morris added, His opinions – to which he is entitled – were not the subject for their concern on 28 July. It was his association to others who are possibly involved in prohibited activities.”

Details of the Stop

The activist had turned up alone at the Eurotunnel in a luxury vehicle belonging to a friend and was traveling to the holiday destination of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a carry-on, the trial heard.

The funds was said to have been from a donation drive to offset costs from arranging a major rally that took place the previous day in Trafalgar Square.

Defense Submissions

Robinson, who denies non-compliance with anti-terror laws during the incident on July 28 last year, faces up to three months in prison or a possible £2,500 penalty if found guilty.

His lawyer, defense counsel, said in closing submissions that anti-terror officers who stopped Robinson had engaged in a speculative search” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Referring to evidence from officers who said they called other organizations” after detaining Robinson, the defense lawyer claimed this was a reference to the intelligence agencies and that no evidence had been presented from the security service to suggest his defendant was a security threat.

He said the police action was “discriminatory” because it was based to a “significant degree on a personal attribute.” He stated that the “predominant influence” on the choice to detain him was recognizing his identity”.

He noted that officers had used an “extraordinary power that must be properly policed” to try to discover details that was already known. Williamson suggested that his client traveled to the resort regularly, which should have lessened the officers’ concerns about him.

Legal Costs and Judgment Date

The activist stated that his legal costs in the proceedings were being paid for by Elon Musk, the proprietor of social media and electric car companies, who has emerged as an ally of the campaigner and recently addressed a gathering arranged by him in London via a online broadcast.

A suggested date of next Tuesday for the verdict was changed by the magistrate, the judge, after Williamson explained Robinson was due to be a guest of the Israel's administration from Wednesday and would not come back until 25 October.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated the barrister.

The judge announced he would hand down his verdict on the morning of 4 November.