🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to employ a revised congressional district plan that could add several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Typically, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior House figure said the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.